The competition is heating up for three highly sought-after gaming permits in the lower part of New York State, and Mayor Adams’ team is placing a significant wager on the metropolis. They’re suggesting extensive modifications to property development regulations, with the goal of making large portions of the city available for casino construction. This action sends a clear message to potential applicants: New York City is eager to participate.
If the proposed alterations are implemented, industrial areas and numerous business zones, including those with less density, would become potential locations for casinos. Furthermore, size limitations would be eliminated, allowing these gaming establishments to be enormous, potentially encompassing dining establishments, lodging facilities, and other entertainment options.
Municipal authorities contend that these adjustments are essential to simplify the selection process and provide New York City with a competitive edge against formidable rivals. They emphasize that existing zoning ordinances essentially prohibit the construction of a casino within the city, placing potential bidders at a disadvantage.
While numerous contenders have their sights set on the city, boasting a population of 8.8 million, one notable proposal is focused just beyond the city’s boundaries, at the Nassau Coliseum in Long Island. Simultaneously, established gaming giants like Resorts World Casino at Aqueduct Racetrack and Empire City Casino are considered formidable contenders due to their substantial size and existing facilities.
However, before any wagers can be placed, the proposed zoning modifications must navigate the city’s intricate land use review procedure. This entails securing approval from local community boards, borough leaders, and the City Council, followed by the City Planning Commission, the City Council once again, and finally, the Mayor. If approved, the selected casino projects would be exempt from the customary protracted and expensive environmental assessment process.
Prior to a gaming establishment proposition being presented to the state gaming board, it requires a substantial majority vote from a local neighborhood advisory panel. This incorporates a level of community input and could significantly determine the success or failure of ventures encountering resistance, such as the contentious one in the Coney Island area.
Certain individuals, including Layla Law-Gisiko from the Community Board Five in Manhattan, are not enthusiastic. They harbor concerns that the proposition lacks clarity, might conflict with current zoning regulations, and lacks the detailed information found in previous versions. Law-Gisiko desires to see significant alterations to alleviate these apprehensions.
